This series was inspired by The Guardian’s column “This Much I Know”, in which well-known figures share their life lessons. Here we ask people from a wide range of backgrounds about their experiences of how to live, positively, whatever the situation, or even diagnosis.
Charmaine Williams is the Associate Dean Academic of Social Work and the Factor-Inwentash Chair in Health and Mental Health at the University of Toronto.
I first came across Charmaine through Coursera. Earlier this spring, I took her class on ‘The Social Context of Mental Health and Mental Illness’, which explored how we can position our understanding of mental health and illness within the context of evolving social attitudes and social developments.
I expected to be one of the few taking this course. It turned out there were another 27,000 students (small compared to computer programming, significant compared to social sciences). That was the first surprise. The second was Charmaine’s proactive, and positive, approach to mental health, and mental illness, even when having worked in the field for over a decade.
The following extracts are taken from a recent conversation with Charmaine:
I feel like I waited my whole life to teach the course. Part of that course was an anti-stigma project. At the very least, it starts with a conversation.
I was surprised by how many mental health professionals were in the course. There seems to be a gap, that people aren’t able to access that kind of information in one place.
I was in professional practice in the mental health care system for over a decade. My optimism derives from seeing people come from very difficult places and their lives really changing. I would never know how things could change, and when they could change. But they did. It was a privilege to see how this happened, that people can have a good life again. What is that piece that changes for people?
Most people who experience mental illness go on to recover. Many people in hospital didn’t have to come back. But what does bring those other people back? Their trajectory is different, they could do everything right but other things are happening as well.
I believe there is a biological basis for mental illness. But there are these other things around it. I really believe that the social context can be a part of what brings healing. I’m not dismissive of medications but they are not the whole picture.
The psychosocial piece can be scary for family members. Talking about social environments and psychology can be associated with pointing the finger.
I believe that mental illness can be prevented. That people may have the potential for developing mental illness but it is not inevitable, even in the case of families impacted by mental illness over multiple generations.
Early intervention work is necessary. It makes sense to be vigilant about detecting declines in mental health. Part of early intervention and monitoring is trying to prevent that first episode. I do think there are things people can do – for instance increase resilience to stress, and becoming conscious of early signs of illness, like social withdrawal. We need to think about the wider scope. What are we doing to intervene or disrupt the possibilities for developing mental illness?
Why do some people stay mentally healthy and why do some people get mentally ill? We still need to find a satisfying explanation for why people get mentally ill. Biology is one piece of the puzzle.
If someone has had an episode of mental illness, they can’t take mental health for granted. They have to be careful about taking care of themselves and not get nonchalant about neglecting their mental health, whether that’s not getting enough sleep or not getting enough exercise. They can’t be nonchalant about this, they have to be vigilant. That is the reality of their life. This can mean some grieving for a lost “normal life”. That you have to work so hard to stay well. But it also puts something in your hands. There are things you can do to make a difference.
As a social worker, my area was this social piece. Now as an academic, it’s building the evidence around this.
The position of the social worker in health care is eroding. This piece of meeting with families and people in transition isn’t valued in the same way. It’s on social workers to demonstrate the importance of their work. We need that evidence, of how people can live in communities. We need to activate, and advocate, as a field.
People are talking about mental illness more. People are probably most open about depression, less open about illnesses like bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, etc.
There are people in the field who prefer the term ‘mental health issues’, which can seem muddling, but it seems to be a term that allows us to speak of mental illness. That precision also allows us to distinguish it from physical health. But even then discussing mental health or emotional problems doesn’t seem complete, as it’s not just about emotions or cognitive functioning. It’s all part of talking about health more generally.
There is also now a tendency in the field to refer to the neurological – it’s a more acceptable language that distances mental illness from the ideas of lunatic or asylums.
How we define mental health affects people’s behavior, their attitudes towards themselves, and the way others look upon them.
The National Institute for Mental Health, the Center for Addiction and Mental Health and the Institute for Psychiatry are all doing great research and education. They make information available on what their findings can mean and are trying to create resources that can be useful to an audience.